SENANAYAKE E.L. v. NAVARATNE H.M.
1953 Present: Nagalingam
A.C.J., Gratiaen J. and Pulle J.
E. L. SENANAYAKE, Appellant, and H. M. NAVARATNE
et al., Respondents
ELECTION PETITION APPEAL NO. 1 OF 1953
Election Petition 3 of 1952, Kandy
Election Petition-False
declaration as to election expenses-Ground for unseating member-Time limit for
presenting election petition-" Candidate "-Corrupt practice of printing and
publishing handbills, &c, without disclosing addresses of printer and
publisher-Corrupt intention-Necessary ingredient-" Publisher " -Statute with
retrospective operation-Scope of its effect-Ceylon (Parliamentary Elections)
Order in Council of 1946, ss. 3 (1), 58 (1) (c) and (f), 70, 73A, 77, 82A and B,
S3 (1), 83 (1) (b) (i) and (ii), 83 (2)-Ceylon (Parliamentary Elections)
(Amendment) Act, No. 26 of 1953, ss. 5, 6.
Held, by NAGALINGAM A.C.J. and PULLE J. (GRATIAEN J.
dissenting), that knowingly sending a false return of election expenses, being a
corrupt practice under section 58 (1) (f) of the Parliamentary Elections Order
in Council of 1946, falls within the ambit of sections 77 (c) and 83 (1) (a).
The act of making the declaration is an ac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.