SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SOYSA L.H. v. THE QUEEN


Soysa, L.H. V. The Queen

[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL]

1952 Present: Gunasekara J. (President), Pulle J. and
L. M. D. de Silva J.

L. H. SOYSA,
Appellant, and THE QUEEN, Respondent

 APPEAL 61 WITH APPLICATION 89 OF 1952

S. C. 30-M. C. Kurunegala, 5,687
 

Charge of murder-Plea of self-defence--Right of private defence exceeded-Proper direction to jury-Penal Code, s. 294, Exception 2-Jury's rider recommending mercy-Effect on reasonableness of verdict.

Appellant, who was convicted of murder, gave evidence at the trial stating that he had killed the deceased in self-defence. As regards the second exception to section 294 of the Penal Code, the presiding Judge directed the jury that if the accused exceeded the right of private defence he was guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. It was contended for the appellant that the jury should also have been directed to consider whether the appellant had acted without any intention of doing more harm than was necessary for the purpose of such defence, and that the omission of such a direction made the direction that was given a misdirection.

Held, that there was no misdirection. On the contrary the direction





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top