HEENATIGALA W. v. BIRD L.G.
1954 Present: Pulle J.
and Swan J.
W. HEENATIGALA, Appellant, and L. G. BIRD, Respondent
S. C. 377-D. C. Colombo, 6,531L
Rent Restriction Act, No. 29
of 1948-Section 13-Letting of co-owned premises- Partition sale
thereafter-Effect of such sale on the tenancy agreement.
Per PULLE J.-Where premises which are owned in common are let under a
contract of tenancy and, subsequently, one of the co-owners purchases the
premises at a partition sale, the certificate of sale has the effect of
terminating the relationship of landlord and tenant and of constituting the
purchaser an independent title holder to whom the restriction contained in
section 13 of the Rent Restriction Act cannot apply. The certificate confers a
title which is not subject to the tenancy agreement.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court, Colombo.
Sir Lalita Rajapakse, Q. C'., with Kingsley Herat and H. R. Gunawardene, for the
plaintiff appellant.-The purchaser, even if he he a co-owner and the former
landlord, gets a new title, which is created by the partition decree which is a
decree in rem-Bernard v. Fernando1[(1913) 16 N. L. R. 438.], Seedin v. Thedia 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.