SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SITHAMPARANATHER MAILVAGANAM v. KUMARASWAMY KURUKKAL RAMANATHA AIYAR


Sithamparanather Mailvaganam V. Kumaraswamy Kurukkal Ramanatha Aiyar

1953 Present: Rose C.J., Nagalingam S.P.J. and K. D. de Silva J.

SITHAMPARANATHER MAILVAGANAM et al.
Appellants,

and KUMARASWAMY KURUKKAL RAMANATHA
AIYAR et al.,
Respondents

S. C. 58-D. C. Jaffna, 395T
 

Hindu temple-No evidence of express dedication-Charitable trust-Inference of its . existence-Relevant factors-Trusts Ordinance (Cap. 72), s. 107.

In deciding, under section 107 of the Trusts Ordinance, whether or not a temple, even in the absence of an express dedication, should be deemed to be a charitable trust, such matters as the holding of public services at the temple, donations to the temple by members of the public throughout a long period of time and improvements effected to it by them are matters which can properly be taken into consideration.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Jaffna. This case was referred to a Bench of three Judges owing to a difference of opinion between the two Judges before whom it had been previously listed.

S. J. V. Chelvanayakam, Q. C., with C. Vanniasingham and C. Shanmuganayagam, for the plaintiffs appellants.

E. B. Wikramanayake, Q. C.,










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top