SITHAMPARANATHER MAILVAGANAM v. KUMARASWAMY KURUKKAL RAMANATHA AIYAR
1953 Present: Rose C.J.,
Nagalingam S.P.J. and K. D. de Silva J.
SITHAMPARANATHER MAILVAGANAM et al. Appellants,
and KUMARASWAMY KURUKKAL RAMANATHA
AIYAR et al., Respondents
S. C. 58-D. C. Jaffna, 395T
Hindu temple-No evidence of
express dedication-Charitable trust-Inference of its . existence-Relevant
factors-Trusts Ordinance (Cap. 72), s. 107.
In deciding, under section 107 of the Trusts Ordinance, whether or not a temple,
even in the absence of an express dedication, should be deemed to be a
charitable trust, such matters as the holding of public services at the temple,
donations to the temple by members of the public throughout a long period of
time and improvements effected to it by them are matters which can properly be
taken into consideration.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court, Jaffna. This case was referred to a Bench
of three Judges owing to a difference of opinion between the two Judges before
whom it had been previously listed.
S. J. V. Chelvanayakam, Q. C., with C. Vanniasingham and C. Shanmuganayagam, for
the plaintiffs appellants.
E. B. Wikramanayake, Q. C.,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.