SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

APPUHAMY H.K.J. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL


Appuhamy, H.K.J. V. Attorney General

1954 Present: Gratiaen J. and Gunasekara J.

H. K. J. APPUHAMY,
Appellant, and THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL,
Respondent

S. C. 371-D. C. Ratnapura, 8,638M
 

Contract-Tender-Execution of a further agreement-Point of time when contract becomes binding.

Plaintiff had been invited to make a tender for certain work on the understanding that, if the tender was accepted, he would be required within a fixed period of time to sign an agreement for the due performance of the work. He accordingly signed an agreement whereby he undertook to complete the work within a certain period.

Held, that the contract automatically became operative as soon as the plaintiff signed the agreement. It was not open to the other party thereafter to change his mind on the ground that he had not signed the agreement himself.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Ratnapura.

Sir Ukwatte Jayasundera, Q. C., with V. T. de Zoysa and G. T. Samarawickreme, for the plaintiff appellant.

B. C. F. Jayaratne, Crown Counsel, for the Crown.

Cur. adv. vult.

April 5, 1954. GRATIAEN J.-

This is an action against the Crown for breach of contract.

In December 1946 tend






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top