SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

COREA D.H.R.A. v. THE QUEEN


Corea, D.H.R.A. V. The Queen

1954 Present: Gratiaen J. and Fernando A. J.

D. H. R. A. COREA et al.,
Appellants, and THE QUEEN, Respondent

S. C. 33-35-D. C. (Criminal) Nuwara Eliya, 279
 

Arrest without warrant-Cognizable offence-Duty to inform suspect of the charge against him-Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 23 (1), 32 (1) (b), 35, 53-Penal Code, ss. 69, 333, 348.

A police officer acts illegally in Ceylon (as in England) if he arrests a man without a warrant on a mere ' unexpressed suspicion ' that a particular cognizable offence has been committed-unless ' the circumstances are such that the man must know the general nature of the offence for which he is detained or unless the man ' himself produces the situation which makes it practically impossible to inform him. In such a case the police officer is liable to be convicted under the Penal Code for assault and wrongful confinement.

Held further, that a police constable who bonafide arrests a person on an order wrongly given by his senior officer is in certain circumstances entitled to claim the benefit of the exception to criminal liability set out in section 69 of the Penal Code.

APPEAL from a judgment of


































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top