SAVERIMUTTU S. v. THANGAVELAUTHAM P.
[IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL]
1954 Present: Earl Jowitt, Lord Keith of Avonham and
Mr. L. M. D. de Silva
S. SAVERIMUTTU, Appellant, and P. THANGAVELAUTHAM et al.,
Respondents
Privy Council Appeal No. 14 of 1953
S. C. 174-D. C. Point Pedro, 2,761
Trust-Sale of land by debtor
to creditor-Adequate consideration-Parol evidence of agreement by transferee to
reconvey the land-Admissibility-Prevention of Frauds Ordinance (Cap. 57), s.
2-Trusts Ordinance (Cap. 72), s. 5 (1) and (3).
Although in some cases the provisions of section 2 of the Prevention of Frauds
Ordinance have been relaxed on proof of fraud on the ground that the " Statute
of Frauds may not be made an instrument of fraud ", this proposition has only a
limited application, and it is necessary that Courts should approach with
caution the facts and the law on which any case is claimed to be an exception to
the general rule that a transaction relating to immovable property is invalid
unless the terms of the transaction have been embodied in a notarially attested
document.
A. transferred for adequate consideration certain immovable property to B. by
Deed No. 3. The proper
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.