CHISSEL v. CHAPMAN
1954 Present: Gratiaen J. and
Fernando A. J.
DR. P. J. CHISSEL, Appellant, and R. C. CHAPMAN,
Respondent
S. C. 484-D. C. Colombo, 21,987M
Delict-Action for " injurious
falsehood "-Dolus or animus injuriandi is necessary
ingredient-Negligence-Incidence of liability-Duty of care.
If A, in discharge of a contractual obligation which he owes to B, makes to B a
negligent but honest and non-defamatory statement in relation to a third party
C, A is not liable to C for pecuniary loss sustained by him in consequence of
the statement.
Cable and Wireless Ltd. employed the defendant, who was a medical practitioner,
to examine the plaintiff and report whether the plaintiff, who had been accepted
for service as a telegraphist-apprentice, was physically fit for permanent
employment as a telegraphist. Defendant examined the plaintiff, but reported
that he was unable to recommend him for service with the Company. As a direct
consequence of this report, the plaintiff's engagement as an apprentice was
abruptly but lawfully terminated by the Company. Plaintiff then instituted the
present action claiming damages from the defendant. He alleged that he was
pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.