PERERA v. DHARMATILLAKE
1954 Present: Nagalingam S.P.J.
K. V. PERERA, Appellant, and K. A. DHARMATILLAKE
(Assistant Clerk, Teldeniya Town Council), Respondent
S. C. 1,054-M. C. Teldeniya, 10,264
Town Councils Ordinance, No. 3
of 1946-Section 183--Arrears of rates-Procedure for recovery-Distress
warrant-Must contain necessary particulars-Municipal Councils Ordinance, No. 29
of 1947, s. 252-Penal Code, ss. 183, 314.
When the Chairman of a Town Council authorises an officer to distrain the goods
of a rate-payer who is in arrears with his rates, the warrant must specify the
name of the defaulter, the description and situation of the properties and the
amount of rate in arrears, as required by section 183 of the Town Councils
Ordinance read with section 252 of the Municipal Councils Ordinance. Such
particulars are an essential part of the warrant, and resistance to the
execution of a warrant which does not contain the particulars is not punishable
under sections 183 and 314 of the Penal Code.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Magistrate's Court, Teldeniya.
B. S. C. Ratwatte, for the accused appellant.
T. R. Dissanayake, for the complainant respondent.
Cur. adv. vul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.