ARUMUGAM v. VIJAYARATNAM et al.
Present: Sansoni J.
C. S. ARUMUGAM, Appellant, and A. VIJAYARATNAM
(Inspector of Police) et al, Respondents
S. C. 701-M. C. Jaffna, No. 2 (Extradition)
Extradition-Foreign
warrant-Form of endorsement-Same warrant cannot be executed twice-Fugitive
Offenders Act, 1881, ss. 3, 13, 14, 26.
A warrant is sufficiently endorsed for the purpose of compliance with sections
13 and, 26 Of the fugitive Offenders Act if it bears the more signature of the
authority endorsing ; the endorsement need not be specifically directed to the
police officers or other officials entitled to execute the warrant.
Once a warrant has been executed, no further action can be taken on it. If,
therefore, an offender arrested under it is discharged on the ground that there
is not enough proof that it was issued by a person having lawful authority to
issue it, he cannot be arrested again on the same warrant even if the officer
executing it establishes that it was issued by lawful authority.
APPEAL
from an order of the Magistrate's Court, Jaffna.
E. R. S. R. Coomaraswamy, with E. B. Vannithamby and Daya Perera, for the
appellant.
Douglas Jansze, Acting Solicito
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.