SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DEP v. NAGARATNAM


Dep V. Nagaratnam

1954 Present: Fernando A.J.

W. L. A. DEP et al., Petitioners, and P. NAGARATNAM,
Respondent

S. C. 249-Application in Revision in
C. R. Colombo, 32,445

Jurisdiction-Court acting beyond its powers-Consent of parties-Validity of compromise-Sent Restriction Act, No. 29 of 1948, s. 13.

Although parties cannot by agreement give the Courts jurisdiction which the Legislature has enacted that they are not to have, nevertheless a compromise after action which is advantageous to a party and secured to him by a decree subsequently entered of consent is not void as offending the prohibition against waiver. A sub-tenant, therefore, who, after a decree has been entered against the tenant, consents to be bound by it upon conditions advantageous to himself and embodied in the decree by adjustment, cannot subsequently resist enforcement of the decree on the ground that it is invalid for lack of juris, diction. The sub-tenant, in such a case, forfeits by waiver the protection of section 13 of the Rent Restriction Act.

APPLICATION to revise an order of the Court of Requests, Colombo.

L. C. Weeramantry, for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants petitioners.

P. So


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top