DEP v. NAGARATNAM
1954 Present: Fernando A.J.
W. L. A. DEP et al., Petitioners, and P. NAGARATNAM,
Respondent
S. C. 249-Application in
Revision in
C. R. Colombo, 32,445
Jurisdiction-Court acting
beyond its powers-Consent of parties-Validity of compromise-Sent Restriction
Act, No. 29 of 1948, s. 13.
Although parties cannot by agreement give the Courts jurisdiction which the
Legislature has enacted that they are not to have, nevertheless a compromise
after action which is advantageous to a party and secured to him by a decree
subsequently entered of consent is not void as offending the prohibition against
waiver. A sub-tenant, therefore, who, after a decree has been entered against
the tenant, consents to be bound by it upon conditions advantageous to himself
and embodied in the decree by adjustment, cannot subsequently resist enforcement
of the decree on the ground that it is invalid for lack of juris, diction. The
sub-tenant, in such a case, forfeits by waiver the protection of section 13 of
the Rent Restriction Act.
APPLICATION
to revise an order of the Court of Requests, Colombo.
L. C. Weeramantry, for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants petitioners.
P. So
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.