WICKREMASINGHE v. ABDUL RAHEEM
NLR56V280
1954 Present: de Silva J. and
Sansoni J.
H. L. WICKREMASINGHE, Appellant, and S. A. M. ABDUL RAHEEM,
Respondent
S. C. 241-D. C. Colombo, 29,150M
Rent Restriction Act, No. 29
of 1948-Death of tenant-Continuance of tenancy-. Section 18 (2)-Exclusive
jurisdiction of Board of Review.
Where, on the death of a tenant, a person gives notice to the landlord, in terms
of section 18 (2) of the Rent Restriction Act, stating that he proposes, in his
status as a member of the household of the deceased tenant, to continue in
occupation of the leased premises as the tenant thereof, the landlord must, if
he objects to the status of such person to give the notice, make an application
to the Rent Control Board under section 18 (3), and is not entitled to raise
such objection in a court of law in an action to eject the person who claims to
be the new tenant.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court, Colombo.
E. R. S. R. Coomaraswamy with Daya Perera, for the plaintiff appellant.
No appearance for the defendant respondent.
M. Fernando, Crown Counsel, as amicus curiae, on notice.
Cur. adv. vult
December 20, 1954. DE SILVA
J.-
This appeal involves the interpretation of section 18 of the Rent-Restriction
Act of 1948 (herein referred to as the Act). This section reads:-
(1) Notwithstanding anything in any other law, but subject to any provision to
the contrary in any written contract or agreement, the succeeding provisions of
this section shall have effect in the event of the death of the tenant of any
residential premises to which this Act applies.
(2) Any person who-
(a) is the surviving spouse or the child, parent brother or sister of the
deceased tenant of the premises, or was a dependant of the deceased tenant of
the premises immediately prior to his death ; and
(b) was a member of the household of the deceased tenant (whether in those
premises or in any other premises) during the whole of the period of three
months preceding his death,
shall be entitled to give written notice to the landlord, before the tenth day
of the month succeeding that in which the death occurred,, to the effect that he
proposes to continue in occupation of the premises as tenant thereof; and upon
such written notice being given, such person shall, subject to any order of the
Board as hereinafter provided, be deemed for the purposes of this Act to be the
tenant of the premises with effect from the first day of such succeeding month,
and the provisions of this Act shall apply accordingly.
(3) The landlord of the premises in relation to which any written notice is
given under sub-section (2) by any person may make application to the Board for
an order declaring that such person shall not be deemed as provided in that
sub-section to be the tenant of the premises ; and the Board may make order
accordingly if satisfied that such person is not entitled to give the notice for
which provision is made by that sub-section.
(4) (Not material)
The plaintiff is the owner of
premises bearing assessment No. 371 situated at Dam Street, Colombo, and she let
the same on a monthly tenancy at a rental of Rs. 108-50 to one S. A. Seyad
Hamid, a Proctor practising in Colombo. Mr. Seyad Hamid who was an Indian died
in India on December 24, 1951. Thereafter on 9.1.'52 his brother the defendant
gave notice to the plaintiff, in terms of section 18 (2) of the Act, that he
proposed to continue in occupation of the premises as tenant thereof. The
plaintiff replied to this letter through her Proctor on 12.1.'52 expressing her
unwillingness to accept the notice and also denying the right of the defendant
to avail himself of the provisions of Section 18 (2). When subsequently the
defendant forwarded the rent to the plaintiff she refused to accept it and
instituted this action on 10.6.'52 to eject him and to recover damages at the
rate of Rs. 108.50 on the ground that he was in wrongful and unlawful occu