KANAGALETCHUMY et al. v. MARIKAIR
1954 Present:
Nagalingam S.P.J. and de Silva J.
K. KANAGALETCHUMY et al., Appellants, and
A.. M. M. MARIKAIR, Respondent
S . C 256-D. C. Batticaloa 798L
Lease-Non-payment of rent and
taxes-Forfeiture.
In the absence of a forfeiture clause or an express condition a lease is
not-liable to be cancelled for breach of a covenant to pay rent unless (I) the
nonpayment of rent is deliberate and persistent or contumacious, (2) the lessee
is in arrear of rent for two years and (3) the lessor gives the lessee notice of
terminating the lease if the arrears are not paid.
An undertaking by a lessee to pay taxes in respect of the leased premises is a
condition for the breach of which the lessor is entitled to a cancellation of
the lease.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court, Batticaloa.
C. Renganathan, for the 1st and 2nd defendants appellants.
S. J. V. Chelvanayakam, Q.C., with E. Jayaweerasingham, for the plaintiff
respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
December 21, 1954. DE SILVA
J.-
The two questions which come up for decision in this appeal are (1) In what
circumstances is a lessor entitled to a cancellation of a lease for non-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.