SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GANAPATHY v. RAMASAMY


Ganapathy V. Ramasamy

1954 Present: Pulle J. and Fernando A. J.

M. GANAPATHY, Appellant, and M. RAMASAMY, Respondent

S. C. 105-D, C. Colombo, 19,035
 

Postponement-Conflict of medical certificates-Proper assessment.

Where a medical certificate which was submitted on behalf of the plaintiff in support of an application for a postponement of the hearing of evidence was in conflict with the report of the medical practitioner who examined him on the next day on a commission issued by Court at the instance of the defendant-

Held, that the medical certificate should not be rejected unless it could be said that the medical practitioner who issued it and the plaintiff had conspired to conceal the true facts.

APPEAL from an order of the District Court, Colombo.

N. E. Weerasooria, Q. C., with H. W. Jayewardene, Q. C., and D. R. P. Goonetilleke, for the plaintiff appellant.

C. Thiagalingam, Q. C., with V. Arulambalam, for the defendant respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

December 15, 1954. PULLE J.-

The order from which i his appeal is taken arises out of an application made by the plaintiff's counsel on the 18th December, 1952, for a postponement of the hearing fixed for































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top