SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BAHARAN v. OBEYSEKERA


Baharan V. Obeysekera

1955 Present : K. D. de Silva, J.

J. A. BAHARAN,
Petitioner, and D. G. OBEYSEKERA
(Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax),
Respondent

S. C. 690 of 1954-Application for a Mandate in the nature of a
Writ of Mandamus

Income Tax Ordinance (Cap. 188)-Appeal against assessment -Notice of objection-Conditions which such notice must satisfy-Failure to furnish return of income-Requirements necessary then-Sections 64 (3), 69 (1) (2) (3), 80 (1) (3).

Where an assessee fails to state precisely his grounds of objection against the assessment and merely lodges " an emphatic protest ", such protest is not a notice of objection within the meaning of section 69 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance. Nor is it within the power of the Commissioner to waive the requirements which are set out in section 69 (1) in regard to notice of objection.

Further, under the second proviso to section 69 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, if the assessment appealed against was made in the absence of a return of income, the return of income must be tendered within the period allowed for filing the notice of objection. Failure to tender the return of income would render the noti




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top