BAHARAN v. OBEYSEKERA
1955 Present : K. D. de Silva, J.
J. A. BAHARAN, Petitioner, and D. G. OBEYSEKERA
(Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax), Respondent
S. C. 690 of 1954-Application for a Mandate in the nature of a
Writ of Mandamus
Income Tax Ordinance (Cap. 188)-Appeal against assessment -Notice of
objection-Conditions which such notice must satisfy-Failure to furnish return of
income-Requirements necessary then-Sections 64 (3), 69 (1) (2) (3), 80 (1) (3).
Where an assessee fails to state precisely his grounds of objection against the
assessment and merely lodges " an emphatic protest ", such protest is not a
notice of objection within the meaning of section 69 (1) of the Income Tax
Ordinance. Nor is it within the power of the Commissioner to waive the
requirements which are set out in section 69 (1) in regard to notice of
objection.
Further, under the second proviso to section 69 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance,
if the assessment appealed against was made in the absence of a return of
income, the return of income must be tendered within the period allowed for
filing the notice of objection. Failure to tender the return of income would
render the noti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.