REGINA v. PINHAMY
[IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL]
1955 Present : Basnayake, A.C.J. (President), Pulle, J., and
Weerasooriya, J.
REGINA v. S. PINHAMY APPEAL NO. 102 OF 1955, WITH APPLICATION NO. 157
S. C. 16-M. C. Puttalam, 3,120
Evidence-Identification of a dead person by his skull-Medical witness-Expert
only in medical matters--Evidence Ordinance, s. 45.
In a trial for murder the Judicial Medical Officer of Colombo expressed the
opinion that the skull produced in the case was that of the deceased. He based
his opinion entirely on the examination of a superimposition of an enlarged
photograph of the head of the deceased on a photograph of his skull. There was,
however, no evidence that the medical witness was an expert on identification by
superimposition of photographs.
Held, that it was not established that identification of dead persons by
superimposition of photographs was a science or art within the meaning of
section 45 of the Evidence Ordinance. The mere reference to the medical witness
as " Judicial Medical Officer, Colombo " was insufficient for the purpose of
making his evidence relevant under section 45 of the Evidence Ordinance in
regard to ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.