BRITTO v. HEENATIGALA
1956 Present : Gratiaen, J.,
and Gunasekara, J.
MRS. J. BRITTO, Appellant, and W. HEENATIGALA,
Respondent.
S. C. 432-D. C. Colombo, 6,532
Rent Restriction Act, No. 29 of 1948-Sections 13 and 27-Letting of co-owned
premises- Partition sale thereafter-Does not terminate statutory
tenancy-Partition. Ordinance (Cap. 56), ss. 4,8.
The statutory protection of a tenant under the Rent Restriction Act is not
automatically extinguished if the leased premises are purchased (either by a
co-owner or by a third party) in terms of a decree for sale under the Partition
Ordinance.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court, Colombo.
H. W. Jayewardene, Q.C., with W. P. N. de Silva, for the defendant appellant.
Sir Lalita Rajapakse, Q.C., with C. G. Weeramantry, for the plaintiff
respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
328
February 27, 1956. GRATIAEN, J.-
The question for our decision on this appeal is whether the statutory protection
of a tenant under the Rent Restriction Act No. 29 of 1948 is automatically
extinguished if the leased premises are purchased (either by a co-owner or by a
third party) in terms of a decree for sale under the Partition Ordinance
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.