SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

WANIGASEKARA v. SIMON


Wanigasekara V. Simon

1956 Present : Gratiaen, J.

J. H. WANIGASEKARA (Food and Price Control Inspector),.
Appellant, and K. SIMON, Respondent

S. C. 934-M. C. Matugama, 21,356

" Acquittal "-" Discharge "-Right of appeal--Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 2,. 190, 191, 330, 336-Control of Prices Act, No. 29 of 1950, s. 8 (1).

The inadvertent use by a Magistrate of the word " discharge " in describing an acquittal cannot deprive the accused person of the protection of sections 330 and 336 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

A Magistrate may in certain situations enter a verdict of acquittal under section 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code even before the case for the prosecution has been closed-provided that the Magistrate is satisfied that any-further evidence which the complainant proposes to lead would not suffice to establish a prima facie case of guilt against the accused.

The accused was charged with contravening a price order made under the Control of Prices Act. The Magistrate, without calling for a defence and when the case for the prosecution had been virtually closed, upheld wrongly (but within the scope of his jurisdiction) an objection raised by the defenc



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top