WANIGASEKARA v. SIMON
1956 Present : Gratiaen, J.
J. H. WANIGASEKARA (Food and Price Control Inspector),.
Appellant, and K. SIMON,
Respondent
S. C. 934-M. C. Matugama, 21,356
" Acquittal "-" Discharge "-Right of appeal--Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 2,.
190, 191, 330, 336-Control of Prices Act, No. 29 of 1950, s. 8 (1).
The inadvertent use by a Magistrate of the word " discharge " in describing an
acquittal cannot deprive the accused person of the protection of sections 330
and 336 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
A Magistrate may in certain situations enter a verdict of acquittal under
section 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code even before the case for the
prosecution has been closed-provided that the Magistrate is satisfied that
any-further evidence which the complainant proposes to lead would not suffice to
establish a prima facie case of guilt against the accused.
The accused was charged with contravening a price order made under the Control
of Prices Act. The Magistrate, without calling for a defence and when the case
for the prosecution had been virtually closed, upheld wrongly (but within the
scope of his jurisdiction) an objection raised by the defenc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.