SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL v. SAMARAKKODY


The Attorney General V. Samarakkody

1955 Present : H. N. G. Fernando, J.

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL,
Applicant, and (1) E. P. SAMARAKKODY
(Member of Parliament for Dehiowita), (2) W. DAHANAYAKE
(Member of Parliament for Galle),
Respondents

S. C. 489-In the matter of an Application by the Attorney-General under
Section 23 (1) of the Parliament (Powers and Privileges)
Act, No. 21 of 1953

Parliament-Offence of breach of privilege-Disrespectful conduct in the precincts of the House-Immunity of Members-Meaning and scope of expression " Proceedings in Parliament "-Jurisdiction of Supreme Court-Suspension of sitting of Souse-Condition of time limit-Ceylon Constitution Order in Council, 1946, s. 17 (5)-Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act, No. 21 of 1053, ss. 3, 4, 0, 22, 23, 25, 26.

The two respondents were members of the House of Representatives. At a sitting of the House another member, X, on being suspended from the service of the House, refused to leave the House when he was ordered by the Speaker to do so. . The Speaker thereupon ordered the Sergeant at Arms to remove the member from the House, stated " I suspend the sitting of the House ", and vacated the Chair. T

































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top