SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NANDARAMA v. RATHANAPALA


Nandarama V. Rathanapala

1955 Present : Basnayake, A.C.J., and Pulle, J.

M. NANDARAMA,
Appellant, and A. RATHANAPALA,
Respondent

S. C. 85-D. C. Matara, 21,128

Buddhist Ecclesiastical Law-Viharadhipati-Renunciation of office.

A bhikkhu who is Viharadhipati of a temple is entitled to renounce his office of Viharadhipati.

Not only may a pupil who succeeds to the office of Viharadhipati by virtue of being the senior pupil of his tutor renounce his office, but also a junior pupil nominated by his tutor as his successor is free to renounce his right.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Matara.

H. W. Jayewardene, Q.C., with P. Ranasinghe, for the Plaintiff-Appellant.

N. E. Weerasooria, Q.C., with A. F. Wijemanne, for the Defendant-Respondent.

July 12, 1955. BASNAYAKE, A.C.J.-

This is an action by Malimboda Nandarama (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), the senior pupil of the late Godagama Jinaratana, against Akurugoda Rathanapala (hereinafter referred to as the respondent), the

senior pupil of the late Murungasyaye Sumana, praying that he be declared the Viharadhipati of the temple known as Ogaspe Vihare (hereinafter referred to as Ogaspe)



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top