SOOTHIRATNAM et al. v. ANNAMMA
1954 Present : Gratiaen, J.,
and Gunasekara, J.
SOOTHIRATNAM (widow of V. Velupillai) et al., Appellants, and
ANNAMMA (widow of
Amirthalingam), Respondent
S. C. 403-D. C. Jaffna, 4,900/L
Abatement of action-Actio rei vindicatio-Transfer of subject-matter by plaintiff
pending action-Effect of abatement order on separate action instituted by
plaintiff's transferee-Civil Procedure Code, ss. 396 403, 404-Registration of
Documents Ordinance, s. 11 (1) and (3).
Section 403 of the Civil Procedure Code, which prohibits a fresh action being
brought when an action has abated, directly affects only those persons who,
while they are precluded from instituting separate proceedings on the same cause
of action, nevertheless enjoy the alternative remedy of having the order of
abatement vacated in order that the original action may be proceeded with.
A instituted against B an action for the recovery of certain property. The lis
pendens was not registered. During the pendency of the action, A transferred the
property in dispute to C. Subsequently A died, and, as his legal representatives
took no steps to continue the proceedings, an order of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.