SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SOOTHIRATNAM et al. v. ANNAMMA


Soothiratnam Et Al., V. Annamma

1954 Present : Gratiaen, J., and Gunasekara, J.

SOOTHIRATNAM (widow of V. Velupillai) et al.,
Appellants, and
ANNAMMA (widow of Amirthalingam),
Respondent

S. C. 403-D. C. Jaffna, 4,900/L

Abatement of action-Actio rei vindicatio-Transfer of subject-matter by plaintiff pending action-Effect of abatement order on separate action instituted by plaintiff's transferee-Civil Procedure Code, ss. 396 403, 404-Registration of Documents Ordinance, s. 11 (1) and (3).

Section 403 of the Civil Procedure Code, which prohibits a fresh action being brought when an action has abated, directly affects only those persons who, while they are precluded from instituting separate proceedings on the same cause of action, nevertheless enjoy the alternative remedy of having the order of abatement vacated in order that the original action may be proceeded with.

A instituted against B an action for the recovery of certain property. The lis pendens was not registered. During the pendency of the action, A transferred the property in dispute to C. Subsequently A died, and, as his legal representatives took no steps to continue the proceedings, an order of























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top