RANASINGHE v. PIERIS
1954 Present : de Silva,
J.
A. D. P. RANASINGHE, Appellant, and H. A. R. PIERIS,
Respondent
S. C. 33-C. R. Gampaha, 5,438
Appeal-Security for costs of
appeal-Procedure for furnishing it-Civil Procedure Code, ss. 756 (1) and (3),
757.
A notice of security for costs of appeal given in terms of section 756 of
the Civil Procedure Code is not invalid if the amount of security is not
specified in it.
Where the security bond was perfected upon its acceptance by an officer of the
court and before the security was accepted by the Judge-
Held, that the provisions of sub-section 3 of section 756 of the
Civil Procedure Code could not be invoked to cure the defect.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Court of Requests,
Gampaha.
N. K. Choksy, Q.C., with A. W. Goonewardene and John de Saram,
for the defendant appellant.
H. W. Jayewardene, Q.C., with P. Ranasinghe, for the plaintiff
respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
October 21, 1954. DE SILVA,
J.-
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Commissioner of Requests, Gampaha,
declaring the plaintiff respondent entitled to a decree for rent, ejectment, and
damages. The judgment was delivered on 22nd October 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.