SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KULASEGARAM v. CHARLY SINGHO


Kulasegaram V. Charly Singho

1955 Present: Gunasekara, J.

T. KULASEGARAM,
Appellant, and P. F. CHARLY
SINGHO, Respondent

S. C. 663-M. C. Batticaloa, 20,643

" Ganja "-Not a plant-Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance (Cap. 172). ss. 26, 28, 76 (5).

" Ganja " is not a plant. Possession, therefore, of an article which is described by the prosecution as " ganja, the parts of a hemp plant known as cannabis sativa " is not punishable under section 28, read with section 76 (5), of the Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Magistrates Court, Batticaloa.

 H. A. Wijemanne, Crown Counsel, for the complainant-appellant.

J. N. David, for the accused-respondent.

Cur. adv. vult,

January 17, 1955. GUNASEKARA, J.-

This is an appeal with the sanction of the Attorney-General against an acquittal on a charge of an offence punishable under section 76 (5) of the Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance (Cap. 172). The charge alleged a contravention of section 28, which provides among other things that no person shall without a licence have in his possession " any resin obtained from the hemp plant or the preparations of or extr













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top