SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SELVAN v. SENARATNE


Selvan V. Senaratne

1956 Present: Basnayake, C.J., and K. D. de Silva, J.

M. SELVAN,
Appellant, and SENARATNE (Police Sergeant),
Respondent

S. C. 887-M. C. Ratnapura, 48,063


Evidence-Government Analyst's report-Admissibility-Criminal Procedure Code
8. 406 (3) and (4).

The whole of a report issued by a Government Analyst under section 406 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code is admissible in evidence.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Magistrate's Court, Ratnapura. The question of law involved in this case was reserved in the following terms by Gunasekara, J., under section 48 of the Courts Ordinance, for decision by more than one Judge :-

" The learned Magistrate's finding that the liquor in question has been unlawfully manufactured appears to be based entirely upon the report P8 submitted by the Government Analyst.

The Analyst states in his report 'In my opinion P1 and P2 are liquors which do not fall under the following categories :-

(1) Approved brands of Imported liquors.

(2) Liquors manufactured under licences issued under the Excise Ordinance.'

The question arises whether the admission of the material portions of this report involves the admission of inad






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top