SUPPRAMANIAM CHETTIAR v. WAHID
1956 Present: T. S. Fernando, J.
SUPPRAMANIAM CHETTIAR, Appellant, and M. A.
WAHID, Respondent
S. C. 11-C. R. Colombo, 43,869
Execution of decree to pay money-Judgment debtor an employee in a shop or
office- Liability of his salary and allowances to be seized in execution-Civil
Procedure Code, s. 218 (m)-Amending Act, No. 20 of 1954, has no retrospective
effect- Interpretation Ordinance (Cap. 2), s. 6 (3) (b and c).
The amendment of section 218 (TO) of the Civil Procedure Code by Act No. 20 of
1954 exempting from seizure in execution of a decree to pay money the salary and
allowances of an employee in a shop or office, if such salary and allowances
do not exceed Rs. 500 per mensem, does not have any retrospective operation so
as to deprive a judgment-creditor, who had obtained a decree in his favour
before the date on which the amending Act came into force (viz., March 17,
1954), of his right to seize the salary and allowances payable to his
judgment-debtor even after the date of the amendment.
APPEAL
from an order of the Court of Requests, Colombo.
C. Ranganathan, with S. C. Crossette-Thambiah, for the plaintiff-appellant.
N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.