SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

FERNANDO v. ANTHONY


Fernando V. Anthony

1956 Present: H. N. G. Fernando, S., and T. S. Fernando, J

A. P. FERNANDO,
Appellant, and C. T. ANTHONY,
Respondent

 S. C. 74- D. C. Gampaha, 4,165/L


Appeal-Abatement--Application for typewritten copies-Failure to furnish the necessary fees along with it-Fatal irregularity-Civil Appellate Rules, 193 8, Rules 2 (1) and 4-Payment into Court Order, 1939, Clause 1 (5).

The provision of Rule 2 (1) of the Civil Appellate Rules, 193$, that an application for typewritten copies "shall be accompanied by the fees prescribed in the schedule hereto " is an imperative, and not merely a directory, provision of law. Failure to comply with it is fatal to the reception of the appeal.

Under Clause 1 (5) of the Payment into Court Order, 1939, the date of the receipt given by an authorised Treasury officer is deemed to be the date of a payment into Court of any money required by any written law to be paid in connection with any action or proceeding.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Gampaha.

A. H. C. de Silva, Q. C., with N. U. Weerasekera, for the defendant-appellant.

Walter Jayawardene, with M. Samuqanathan, for the plaintiff. respondent.

Cur

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top