DAYANGANIE v. SOMAWATHIE
1956 Present: Basnayake,
C.J., and Pulle, J.
DAYANGANIE and another, Appellants, and SOMAWATHIE
and another, Respondents
S.C. 203-D.C. (Inty.) Avissawella LA/279
Kandyan Law-Adoption-Inference
from facts and circumstances-Oral public declaration not essential-Kandyan Law
Declaration and Amendment Ordinance, No. 39 of 1938, s. 7.
Evidence of a public declaration by the adoptive parent on a formal occasion
that a particular child was adopted for the purpose of inheriting his estate is
not necessary in order to prove the fact of adoption of an heir under the
Kandyan Law (prior to the commencement of the Kandyan Law Declaration and
Amendment Ordinance). All that is needed is reliable, clear and unmistakable
evidence in whatever form of the adoptive parent's intention to make the foster
child his heir.
Tikiri Banda v. Loku Banda (1905) 2 Bal. R. 144 and Tikiri Kumarihamy v. Punchi
Banda (1901) 2 Browne 299, not followed.
APPEAL
from an order of the District Court,
Avissawella.
Cyril E. S. Perera, Q.C., with H. W. Jayewardene, Q.C., T. B. Dissanayake and P.
Ranasinghe, for 2nd and 3rd Defendant-Appellants.
H. V. Perera, Q.C., with N.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.