SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VELLAITHAMBY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL


Vellaithamby V. The Attorney General

1957 Present: Weerasooriya, J., and Sinnetamby, J.

VELLAITHAMBY,
Appellant, and THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL,
Respondent

S. C. 11-D. C. Batticaloa, 1,090/L

Irrigation Ordinance (Cap. 312)-Certificate of sale in favour of Grown-Nature of Crown's title-Sections'2 {1) (4), 66 (2), 68-Registration of Documents Ordinance (Cap. 101), s. 7 (1).

Where land sold under the Irrigation Ordinance for non-payment of irrigation rates due in respect of it is purchased by the Crown and a certificate is thereafter issued vesting title in the Crown, all previous titles to the land must, by virtue of sections 2 and 66 (2) of the Ordinance, be regarded as wholly extinguished, or suspended, by operation of law, and a new title is created in the Crown which is good against all persons. Accordingly, a subsequent transferee from the original owner of the land cannot claim title to it by priority of registration as against the Crown.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Batticaloa.

Walter Jayawardene, with A. S. Vanigasooriyar, for the plaintiff-appellant.

V. Tennekoon, Crown Counsel, with M. Fernando, Crown Counsel, for the defendant-responde



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top