SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MUTTIAH v. COMMISSIONER FOR REGISTRATION OF INDIAN AND PAKISTANI RESIDENTS


Muttiah V. Commissioner For Registration Of Indian And Pakistani Residents

1957 Present: Sinnetamby, J.

S. MUTTIAH,
Appellant, and COMMISSIONER FOR
REGISTRATION OF INDIAN AND PAKISTANI RESIDENTS,
Respondent

S. C. 53-Citizenship Case No. R/O. 4,509

Indian and Pakistani Residents (Citizenship) Act, No. 3 of 1949-Notice under sections 9 (1) and 20-Procedure for service.

Where a notice issued under section 9 (1) of the Indian and Pakistan Residents (Citizenship) Act is returned unserved and the Commissioner subsequently becomes aware, within three months from the date of the notice, that the applicant has changed his address, the applicant should be informed of the fact that notice under section 9 (1) had been sent to him and had been returned unserved.

APPEAL under the Indian and Pakistani Residents (Citizenship) Act.

S. P. Amarasingham, for the applicant-appellant.

V. G. B. Perera, Crown Counsel, for the respondent.

April 2, 1957. SINNETAMBY, J.-

In this case the applicant in the application form had given his address as Gonakelle Bazaar, Kandapola. Subsequently, he wrote a letter to the Deputy Commissioner on the 4th May, 1953, asking the Deputy Commiss

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top