UNIVERSITY OF CEYLON v. FERNANDO
957 Present :
Basnayake, C.J., Pulle, J., K. D. de Silva, J.,
Sansoni, J., and L. W. de Silva, A.J.
THE UNIVERSITY OF CEYLON, Petitioner, and E. F. W. FERNANDO,
Respondent
S. C. 568-In the matter of an Application for Conditional Leave to
Appeal to the Privy Council in S. C. 559 D. C. Colombo 28,909
Privy Council-Application for
conditional leave to appeal -Notice thereof to opposite: party-Personal service
not necessary--Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance (Cap. 85), Schedule, Rule
2-Appellate Procedure (Privy Council) Order, 1921, Rules 5, 5A, 6.
Rule 2 of the Schedule to the Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance reads as follows
:-
" Application to the court for leave to appeal shall be made by petition, within
thirty days from the date of the judgment to be appealed from, and the applicant
shall, within fourteen days from the date of such judgment, give the opposite
party notice of such intended application. "
Held, that the Rule does not require personal service of the
notice required to be given thereunder and that Rules 5 and 5A of the Appellate
Procedure (Privy Council) Order, 1921, have no application to it. Accordingly
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.