WIJEMANNE v. COSTA
1959 Present :
Weerasooriya, J., and K. D. de Silva, J.
D. G. WIJEMANNE, Appellant, and C. COSTA, Respondent
S. C 76, with Application 210-D. C. Panadura, 4,824
Appeal-Abatement-Security for costs-Hypothecation by bond prior to acceptance of
security by Court-Effect-Officer" before whom the bold may be executed- Civil
Procedure Code, 88.756 (1) and (3), 757.
An order abating an appeal would be valid if the bond hypothecating security
for costs of appeal in terms of section 756 (J) read with section 757 of the
Civil Procedure Code is executed before the security is accepted by the Court.
However, if the security given is in cash, relief may be granted under
sub-section 20f section 756.
A bond hypothecating security for costs of appeal must be executed before the
.Judge or the Secretary or the Chief Clerk, A bond, therefore, hypothecating a
sun of money and signed before a Justice of the Peace is not a valid
hypothecation.
APPEAL,
with application in revision, from an order of the District Court, Panadura.
H. V. Perera, Q.C., with E. A. G. de Silva and M. L. de Silva, for the-
defendant-appellant.
C. Thiagalingam, Q.C., with T. P. P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.