SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

UDALAGAMA v. BOANGE


Udalagama V. Boange

[IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL]

1959 Present : Lord Reid, Lord Tucker, Lord Somervell of Harrow,
Lord .Denning and Mr. L. M. D. de Silva

C. V. UDALAGAMA, Appellant, and IRANGANIE BOANGE,
Respondent

Privy Council Appeal No. 14 of 1958

S. C. 444--D.C Kegalle, 7,813

    Breach of promise of marriage-Action for recovery of damage Promise in writing- Relevancy of oral promise to marry-.Marriage Registration Ordinance (Ca,. 95), s.19.

By section 19 of the Marriage Registration Ordinance-

". ...no action shall lie for the recovery of damages for breach of promise of marriage, unless such promise of marriage shall have been made in writing. "

Held, that documentary evidence which does not in express or other unequivocal terms contain promise to marry is insufficient to prove a promise in writing even though it may afford evidence of an oral promise to marry. The writing required to satisfy the Ordinance must contain an express promise to marry or confirm a previous oral promise to marry, i.e., admit the making of the promise and evince continuing willingness to be bound by it.

Jayasinghe. Perera (1903) 9 N. L. R. 62, overruled.

APPEAL from a judgment































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top