UDALAGAMA v. BOANGE
[IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL]
1959 Present : Lord Reid, Lord Tucker, Lord Somervell of
Harrow,
Lord .Denning and Mr. L. M. D. de Silva
C. V. UDALAGAMA, Appellant, and IRANGANIE BOANGE,
Respondent
Privy Council Appeal No. 14 of 1958
S. C. 444--D.C Kegalle, 7,813
Breach of
promise of marriage-Action for recovery of damage Promise in writing- Relevancy
of oral promise to marry-.Marriage Registration Ordinance (Ca,. 95), s.19.
By section 19 of the Marriage Registration Ordinance-
". ...no action shall lie for the recovery of damages for breach of promise of
marriage, unless such promise of marriage shall have been made in writing. "
Held, that documentary evidence which does not in express or other
unequivocal terms contain promise to marry is insufficient to prove a promise in
writing even though it may afford evidence of an oral promise to marry. The
writing required to satisfy the Ordinance must contain an express promise to
marry or confirm a previous oral promise to marry, i.e., admit the making of the
promise and evince continuing willingness to be bound by it.
Jayasinghe. Perera (1903) 9 N. L. R. 62, overruled.
APPEAL
from a judgment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.