SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

EMJAY INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. JAMES PERERA


Emjay Insurance Co. Ltd. V. James Perera

1957 Present : H. N. G. Fernando, J., and T. S. Fernando, J.

EMJAY INSURANCE CO., LTD., Appellant, and JAMES PERERA,
Respondent

S.C.513-D.C.Colombo, 29,431/M

    Evidence-" Admission "-No requirement that it should be adverse to the person who made it-Statement made by a deceased person-Admissibility as admission against representative in interest-Contract of life insurance-Adminiatrator'3 position as representative in interest of deceased policy holder-Evidence Ordinance, ss.17,18,21,32.

A statement, in order to be an "admission ", need not be "adverse " to the person making it. Section 17 of the Evidence Ordinance makes it clear that the only characteristics which a statement must possess in order to constitute it an admission are (1) that it suggests an inference as to a relevant fact or a fact in issue, and (2) that it must be made by one of the persons and in the circumstances hereinafter mentioned "; The following sections contain no reference to the need that the statement should be adverse to or against the interest of the maker, and section 21 permits all admissions to be proved as against the maker or his




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top