ZAHIR v. DAVID SILVA
1959 Present:
Basnayake, C.J.
ZAHIR, Appellant, and DAVID SILVA, Respondent
S. C. 202-0. R. Matara, 6379
Landlord
and tenant-Monthly tenancy-Notice to quit-Validity-Evidence-c Admissions-Duty of
Court to record them with care-Evidenc6 Ordinance,s.58.
(i) In the absence of an agreement to the contrary, the notice of termination of
a monthly tenancy must run concurrently with the term of the letting and hiring
and must expire at the end of that term.
The tenancy commenced on 12th March 1952. Notice to quit was given on 30th
January 1957 requesting the defendant to vacate the premises on or before 1st
March 1957.
Held, that, inasmuch as the tenancy commenced not on the 1st day
of the month but on the 12th, the notice was bad.
(ii) In view of the provisions of section 58 of the Evidence Ordinance, Judge
should record with the utmost care any admissions made by the parties.
H. W. Jayewardene, Q.C., with G.
T. Samerawickreme and N. R. 1 Dalutwatte, for Plaintiff Appellant.
D. S. Jayawickreme, Q.C., with R. D. B. Jayasekera, for Defendant Respondent.
Cur. adv. vult
October 28,1959. BASNAYAKE,
C.J.-
The only question for decision on th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.