SUMANASEKARA v. S. I. POLICE ELLA
1957 Present: H.
N. G. Fernando, J.
SUMANASEKARA et al., Appellants, and S. I. POLICE, ELLA,
Respondent
S. C. 725-728-M. O. Badulla-Haldumulla, 22029
Criminal
procedure-Summary case-End of trial-Right of accused or his pleader to address
Court-Criminal Procedure We Code, ss. 189 (3), 211, 235.
In the trial of a 8Ilmmary case under C1UIopter 18 of the Criminal Procedure
Code the accused person or his pleader is not entitled as of right to address
the Court after the evid6nce for the defence has been led.
APPEALS
from a judgment of the Magistrate's Court,
Badulla- Haldumulla.
M. M. Kumarakulasingham, for the accused-appellants.
I. F. B. Wikramanayake, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.
Cur. adv. vult.
June 14,1957. H. N. G.
FERNANDO, J.-
The accused in this case have been bound over on charges of simple hurt and
criminal force under section 325 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No substantial
complaint is made about the correctness of the l findings of fact against them,
but it is necessary for me to consider a criticism of the conduct of the trial
which has been made by the Counsel for the appellants.
After the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.