THE QUEEN v. APPUHAMY N.K.A.
[IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL.
APPEAL]
1960 Present : Sansoni, J. (President), H. N. G. Fernando,
J., and
Sinnetamby, J.
THE QUEEN v. N. K. A. APPUHAMY et al.
Appeals 170-172 and 175-177, with Applications 190-192 and 195-197
S.C.5-m.c.Polonnaruwa,15428
Unlawful assembly-" Common
object "-Distinction between common object and common intention-Presence of a
person at scene of offence--lnference of guilt therefrom---Penal code, s. 138.
Certificate for appeal given by trial Judge-Bearing on the appeal-court of
criminal Appeal Ordinance, No. 23 of 1938, s. 4 (b).
The accused-appellants were indicted, on the 1st count, for having been members
of an unlawful assembly, the common objects of which were to commit mischief by
fire, murder and rape and, on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th counts, for the commission of
the offences of mischief by fire, murder and rape in prosecution of the
respective common objects.
Held, (i) that a common
object in an unlawful assembly is different from a, common intention, in that it
does not require prior concert and a common meeting of minds before the offence
is committed. If each member of the assembly has the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.