ABDUL CADER v. SHERIFF
1960 Present :
K. D. de Silva, J., and T. S. Fernando, J.
A. S. ABDUL CADER, Petitioner, and I. L. M. SHERIFF,
Respondent
S. C. 543-Application for Conditional leave to appeal to the Privy
Council in S. C. 539 of 1957/D. C. Gampaha 797/4947
Privy Council-Application for
conditional leave to appeal-Notice to opposite party- Meaning of " opposite
party "-Invalidity of notice given by a Proctor without due authority-Proof of
notice sent by ordinary post-Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance (Cap. 85),
Schedule, Rule 2.
By Rule 2 of the Rules in the Schedule to the Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance
:-
" Application to the Court for leave to appeal shall be made by petition within
thirty days from the date of the judgment to be appealed from, and the applicant
shall, within fourteen days from the date of such judgment, give the opposite
party notice of such intended application."
Held, that where the
petitioner is a defendant in a partition action, any co-defendant who will be
prejudicially affected by the success of the proposed appeal is an " opposite
party " within the meaning of Rule 2 and must therefore be given notice of the
intended
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.