SENEVIRATNE v. PERERA
1962 Present:
Weerasooriya, J.
SENEVIRATNE, Appellant, and PERERA, Respondent
S. C. 166-G. R. Colombo, 72808
Rent Restriction Act, No. 29
of 194S-Section 13 (1)-Action in respect of " excepted premises "-Effect when,
pending the action, the premises are taken out of the category of " excepted
premises "-" Proceedings for the ejectment of the tenant".
Where, at the time when an action is instituted by a landlord for the
ejectment of his tenant, the premises in question are " excepted premises ",
authorisation of the Board in terms of section 13 (1) of the Rent Restriction
Act does not become subsequently necessary if, during the pendency of the
action, the premises are taken out of the category of " excepted premises " by
reason of the reduction of the annual value of the premises.
APPEAL
from a. judgment of the Court of
Requests, Colombo.
H. V. Perera, Q.C., with H. E. B. Cooray, for the
defendant-appellant
H. W. Jayewardene, Q.C., with R. Manikkavasagar and S. S.
Basnayake for the plaintiff-respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
510
January 17, 1962.
WEERASOORIYA, J.-
This is an appeal by the defendant against the judgment and decree of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.