RATNAM v. PERERA
1961 Present: T.
S. Fernando, J., and Sinnetamby, J.
C. S. RATNAM, Appellant, and K. M. PERERA, Respondent
S. C. 67 of 1959-D. C. Kurunegala, 11,433
Partnership-Dissolution-Action for accounts-Procedure-Civil Procedure Code s.
508.
Contracts-Interpretation-Emphasis on substance and not on
form-Principal and agent-" Commission ".
In an action instituted by a partner against his co-partner
asking for accounts of the partnership which has been dissolved, and for a
distribution of the profits and assets, the proper course for the Court to adopt
is first to decide whether it should call upon the defendant to file an account
and for what period and only thereafter, after giving the plaintiff an
opportunity to falsify and surcharge, proceed to determine what amounts are due
either to the plaintiff or to the defendant, as the case may be.
In construing a contract the Court will look at what the
contract really is and not at what the parties say it is. What the Court has to
consider is not the mere name given to it but the substance of the transaction
and decide what it would in truth and in fact amount to on a consideration of
a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.