WILLIAM v. DHARMASIRI
1962 Present: H.
N. G. Fernando, J.
A. H. WILLIAM, Appellant, and W. A. DHARMASIRI (S. I. Police),
Respondent
S. C. 680-M. C. Colombo, 13617/C
Motor Traffic Act-Section 25
(1)-Charge of using a motor vehicle without a revenue licence-Quantum of
evidence.
A charge under section 25 (1) of the Motor Traffic Act of driving a motor
vehicle for which a revenue licence is not in force cannot be proved merely by
evidence that a licence was not visible when the vehicle was inspected. The fact
that a licence is not in force has to be proved by evidence from the proper
authorities to the effect that the licence had not been issued at the relevant
time.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Magistrate's Court,
Colombo.
S. A. Marikar, for the Accused-Appellant.
D. W. Abeyakoon, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General,
September 24, 1962. H. N. G.
FERNANDO, J.-
The accused-appellant was charged on three counts, firstly, with driving a motor
vehicle for which a revenue licence under the Motor Traffic Act was not in
force, secondly, with failing to make the licence available for inspection, and
thirdly, with driving a motor vehicle while there was not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.