SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PERERA v. SENN


Perera V. Senn

1963 Present: T. S. Fernando, J.

M. C. PERERA, Appellant, and  S. E. SENN Respondent

S. C. 169/1961-C. R. Colombo, 77314

Rent Restriction (Amendment] Act, No. 10 of 1961-Section 13, sub-sections (2) and (3)-Retrospective effect thereof on action relating to " excepted premises "-

Rent Restriction Act, No. 29 -of 1P48, s. 2 (5).

           A landlord instituted action on 7th September, 1960, for the ejectment of his tenant from certain premises which were " excepted premises " within the meaning of section 2 (5) of the Rent Restriction Act, No. 29 of 1948. The Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, No. 10 of 1961, came into operation after the institution of the action but before its trial. One of its results was to take the premises in question outside the category of excepted premises.

   Held, that section 13, sub-sections (2) and (3), of the Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, No. 10 of 1961, had the retrospective effect of rendering the action and proceedings taken subsequent to the filing thereof null and void.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Requests, Colombo.

G. T. Samerawickreme, for the defendant-appellant.

S. Sharvananda
, for t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top