SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BANDA v. PERERA


Banda V. Perera

1963  Present : H. N. G. Fernando, J.

N. M. BANDA
, Petitioner, and K. S. S. PERERA, Respondent

S. C. 16 of 1963-Application for Revision in M. C. Negombo, 13400

Motor Traffic Act-Section 136 (4)-Suspension of driving licence-Duty of Court to call upon the accused for his explanation-Gravity of the offence of driving a motor vehicle without an effective policy of insurance.

An order of suspension of a driving licence should not be made without first giving the accused an opportunity of giving his explanation.

If, because of special circumstances, an order of suspension of the driving licence is not made under section 136 (4) of the Motor Traffic Act when a person is convicted of driving a motor vehicle without an effective policy of insurance, a substantial fine should be imposed.

APPLICATION to revise an order of the Magistrate's Court, Negombo.

A. Wijesekera, with D. S. Wijesinghe, for accused-appellant.

R. I. Obeyesekere, Crown Counsel, for Attorney-General.

March 6, 1963. H. N. G. FERNANDO, J.-

The accused was charged in this case firstly with driving a motor vehicle without a revenue licence and secondly for driving the same vehicle







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top