SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

THE QUEEN v. LIYANAGE AND OTHERS


The Queen V. Liyanage And Others

1963 Present : Sansoni, J. (President), H. N. G. Fernando, J.,
and L. B. de Silva, J.

THE QUEEN v. D. J. F. D. LIYANAGE and others

TRAIL AT BAR No. 2 OF 1962

    Trial-at-Bar-Procedure-Material necessary for preparation of defence-Right of defendants to have information about it before trial-Penal Code, ss. 114, 115-- Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 6, 186 (2), 38'j-Sub-section.? (J), (fi) and (7) of Section 440A of Criminal Procedure Code as enacted by the Criminal Law Act, No. 31 of 1962.

In a criminal case tried in the Supreme Court on Information filed by the Attorney-General under section 440A of the Criminal Procedure Code as enacted by the Criminal Law Act, No. 31 of 1962-

Held, that the defendants were entitled to the following information before they tendered their general plea and prior to the commencement of the trial proper:-

(a) Lists of the prosecution witnesses and documents ;

(b) Copies of the statements which were made to the investigating officers by the prosecution witnesses or the defendants and which the Attorney-General intended to produce in evidence ;

(c) Copies of the documents on which the prose
















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top