ISMAIL v. MUTHU MARLIYA
1963 Present :
Herat, J.
A. L. M. ISMAIL, Appellant, and A. A. MUTHU MARLIYA, Respondent
S. C. 476/63-M. G. Kalutara, 7728
Maintenance-Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act (Cap. 115)-Claim for maintenance
under Section 47-Exclusive jurisdiction conferred by Section 48 on
Quazi-Invalidity of appointment of Quazi under Section 12 (1)-Constitution Order
in Council, s. 55-Lack of jurisdiction of a Magistrate's Court to hear such
claims under Maintenance Ordinance (Cap. 91).
A Magistrate's Court has no jurisdiction to hear under the Maintenance Ordinance
(Cap. 91) a claim for maintenance Which, by virtue of the provisions of section
48 of the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act, falls under the exclusive
jurisdiction of a validly appointed Quazi. In such a case, the fact that Section
12 (1) of the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act is ultta vires as being in
conflict with Section 55 of the Constitution Order in Council and, therefore,
the persons appointed as Quazis by the Minister were not validly appointed is
not material.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Magistrate's Court,
Kalutara.
Izadeen Mohamed, with M. T. M. Sivardeen, for the Defend
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.