VICTOR PERERA v. JINADASA
1962 Present :
T. S. Fernando, J., and Abeyesundere, J.
W. A. VICTOR PERERA, Appellant, and K. DON JINADASA and 9 others,
Respondents
S. C. 588-D. C. Colombo, 8576/L
Partition
action-Interlocutory decree-Extent of its finality-Effect of failure to register
lis pendens-Partition Act (Cap. 69), s. 48 (3).
In partition suit No. 7059 R, who was added as a party, did not take any action
herself in respect of the suit and did not participate at the trial. After
interlocutory decree was entered she attempted to intervene in the suit in order
to obtain either a dismissal of the suit or an exclusion of Lots 1 and 2 in the
corpus. Her attempt proved unsuccessful. Thereafter she transferred her rights
in Lots 1 and 2 to V. P. Relying upon this deed of transfer, V. P. instituted
the present action No. 8576 claiming a declaration of title to Lots 1 and 2,
citing as defendants all the persons who had been allotted shares in the
interlocutory decree which dealt with Lots 1, 2 and 3 as one corpus. He claimed
that, inasmuch as the partition action had not been duly registered as a lis
pendens, his right to a declaration of his title was unaf
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.