THE QUEEN v. IBRALEBBE
1963 Present: H.
N. G. Fernando, J., and T. S. Fernando, J.
THE QUEEN v. M. I. M. IBRALEBBE and others
S. C. 14-1711963-D. G. (Grim.) Batticaloa, 126
Indictment-Joinder
of charges based on unlawful assembly with charges based on common
intention-Validity-Penal Code, ss. 32, 140, 146, 296-Criminal Procedure Code,
ss. 178, 180, 184, 425-Court of Criminal Appeal Ordinance, 8. 5 (1), proviso.
"Where several accused were indicted on 13 charges, 7 of which were based on the
allegation that they were members of an unlawful assembly, and the remainder of
which could have resulted in a conviction of two or more of the accused only if
the offences charged had been committed in pursuance of a common intention-
Held, that the joinder of the two seta of charges was lawful.
The Queen v. Don Marthelis and others (1963) 65 N. L. R. 19 not followed.
APPEALS
from a judgment of the District Court,
Batticaloa.
Colvin R. de Silva, with A. R. Mansoor, for the Accused-Appellants.
P. Colin Thome, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.
Cur. adv. vult.
June 7, 1963. H. N. G.
FERNANDO, J.-
Several accused were indicted in this case on 13 charges, 7 of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.