ATTORNEY GENERAL v. SUPPIAH
1961 Present : Tambiah, J.
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Appellant, and N. SUPPIAH and another, Respondents
S. C. 125/61-M.C. Gampola, 6388
Criminal procedure-Accused brought before Magistrate otherwise
than by summons
or warrant-Witnesses who make depositions at pre-trial
stage-Should prosecution call all of them at the trial ?-Criminal Procedure
Code, as. 148 (1)
(b),
151 (2), 187
(1),
189
(1)-Evidence
Ordinance, s. 138.
A witness who is examined at the pre-trial stage when an
accused person is brought before a Magistrate otherwise than on summons or
warrant and who knows nothing about the facts of the case but states only that
the produces the accused on a charge preferred against him need not be called to
give evidence at the trial.
APPEAL from an order of the Magistrate's Court, Gampola.
V. S. A. Pullenayegum, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General, appellant.
No appearance for the Accused-Respondents.
Cur. adv. vult.
May
24, 1961. TAMBIAH,
J.-
The point
which arises for consideration in this case is whether a witness, who was
examined at the pre-trial stage when the accused were brought b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.