SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SKANDA RAJAH, J
FERNANDO – Appellant
Versus
WIJESEKERA – Respondent


Advocates:
N. E. Weerasooria, Q.C., with H. Mohideen, for the petitioner.
A. C. Nadarajah, for the 1st and 3rd respondents.

Fernando V. Wijesekera

1964 Present: Sri Skanda Rajah, J.


R .C. FERNANDO, Petitioner, and E. WIJESEKERA et al, Respondents

S. C. 524/63-Application for Revision in M. C. Colombo, 29,426 and 33,359 (No. 33/64)

Criminal procedure-Assumption by Magistrate of civil jurisdiction in a criminal case-Illegality-Criminal trespass.

      Where, in a prosecution for criminal trespass, the Magistrate decided to have an inspection and to fix the boundary between two lands-

     Held, that a Magistrate is not entitled to convert his criminal jurisdiction into one of civil jurisdiction. Even by agreement parties cannot confer that jurisdiction on a Magistrate.

   APPLICATION to revise an order of the Magistrate's Court, Colombo.

                 N. E. Weerasooria, Q.C., with H. Mohideen,
for the petitioner.

               A. C. Nadarajah, for the 1st and 3rd respondents.

February 20, 1964. SRI SKANDA RAJAH, J.-

   
Magistrates appear to be assuming jurisdictions which are not theirs. Only recently I had occasion to refer to a similar matter-vide S. C. 767-768 M. C. Balapitiya 37267, Supreme Court Minutes of 12th December,

1963. The order that was made by the Magistrat





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top