SINGHO MAHATMAYA v. THE LAND COMMISSIONER
1964 Present: H. N. G.
Fernando, J., and G. P. A. Silva, J.
M. R. SINGHO MAHATMAYA, Appellant, and THE LAND COMMISSIONER, Respondent
S. C. 148/1961-D. C. Colombo, 7621
Land Redemption Ordinance-Section 3-Acquisition of land thereunder-Remedy of
owner-Land Commissioner not a corporation sole-Immunity from being sued nomine
officii-Certiorari.
In an action instituted against the Land Commissioner for the purpose of
obtaining from the Court a declaration that a certain land Was not liable to be
acquired in terms of the Land Redemption Ordinance-
Held, (i) that the Land Commissioner cannot be regarded as a corporation
sole and, therefore, cannot be sued nomine officii.
(ii) that the appropriate remedy of the plaintiff was by Way of an application
for Certiorari.
Observations on the procedural difficulties which Would arise in practice if the
Land Commissioner is sued in any case eo nomine.
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Colombo.
H. V. Perera, Q.C., with Nimal Senanayake and Bala Nadarajah, for the
Plaintiff-Appellant.
Mervyn Fernando, Crown
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.