SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VIRAKESARI LTD. v. FERNANDO


Virakesari Ltd. V. Fernando

1963 Present: Weerasooriya, S.P.J.

VIRAKESARI LTD., Petitioner, and P. O. FERNANDO and 4 others,
Respondents

S. C. 567 /61-Application for a Mandate in the nature of a Writ of
Certiorari

Certiorari-" Error of law appearing on the face of the record "-Legal position as to what constitutes " the record "-Delay as a ground for refusal of writ- Scope-Industrial dispute-" Lock-out"-Industrial Disputes Act (Cap. 131), ss. 3 (1) (c), 4 (2)-Trade Unions Ordinance, s. 2.

     
In an application for a writ of certiorari to quash an award of an Industrial Court in an industrial dispute which was referred for settlement under section 4 (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act-

      Held : (i) The order of an inferior tribunal having a duty to act judicially in determining the rights of parties is liable to be quashed by a writ of certiorari for an error of law on the face of the record. In this connection, the " record " includes not only the formal order, but also all the documents which form the basis of the decision.

              (ii) The omission of an inferior tribunal to take into consideration a relevant document forming part of the recor





























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top